Description
HT-14PDF model and project scope
HT-14PDF is listed in the HecosTech brochure as an in-mold labeling system. Use its printed configuration, travels and component dimensions to prepare a model-specific label-insertion and takeout review. Confirm the supplied configuration against the current project drawing before ordering.
Product illustration: HT-14PDF brochure illustration. The image identifies the brochure model, not a delivered customer project or an approved installed layout.
Brochure technical specifications
Brochure reference: HecosTech company brochure, printed PAGE/08 (PDF page 6). Values below retain the source field definitions. Pending or unclear fields are omitted; confirm the current drawing and supplied configuration for the order.
| Parameter | Brochure reference |
|---|---|
| Electrostatic mode | In-mold + outside-mold |
| Electrostatic voltage | 20 kV |
| Equipment length A | 3,750 mm |
| Equipment width B | 2,000 mm |
| Equipment height C | 1,775 mm |
| Effective transverse travel D | 2,600 mm |
| Effective kick stroke E | 1,080 mm |
| Effective arm travel | 1,400 mm |
| Maximum transverse speed | 1 m/s |
| Maximum kick speed | 2 m/s |
| Maximum arm speed | 2 m/s |
| Label-magazine length L | 1,200 mm |
| Label-magazine width B | 1,020 mm |
| Label-magazine height C | 1,920 mm |
| Drive mode and coordinates as printed | Servo motor; coordinates X/Y/Z |
| Maximum load, brochure reference | 30 kg |
| In-mold unloaded takeout time | 0.8–2 s |
| Small-frame labeling time | 1.8–2.8 s |
| Large-frame labeling time | 2.5–4 s |
| Air consumption | 30 NL/cycle |
| Power supply | AC 380 V |
| Fixture application reference | Dedicated |
| Magazine application / arrangement reference | General-purpose |
| Robot equipment weight | 550 kg |
| Label-magazine equipment weight | 210 kg |
| Label-magazine capacity | 2,000 sheets |
The source table does not specify a fixture-rotation option. Define the required label and product motions with the proposed tooling instead of inferring them from the model code.
Machine, mold and labeling review
- Machine and mold: Provide the machine make/model and actual machine and mold drawings, mounting references, mold-open/ejector sequence and proposed access path. The brochure machine range is a selection reference, not machine/mold approval.
- Product, label and magazine: Provide the molded-product and label references, placement position, cavity arrangement and magazine access requirements. Fixture-volume and dedicated/general-purpose descriptions are brochure references, not approval of the complete labeling cell.
- Moving load and EOAT: Identify the product and tooling masses separately and ask how the quoted maximum load is defined, including any end-of-arm tooling allowance and load distribution. The printed maximum is not established net product payload.
- Installation and access: Locate the equipment and label magazine separately on the project layout. Equipment dimensions and weights do not establish installed clearance, guarding or service access. Confirm drawing datums and any F/G callouts that apply.
- Interfaces and handoff: Define the machine signals, sequence, safety/interlock responsibilities and receiving operation. Identify who supplies and integrates each machine, mold, tooling and downstream item; inclusion and interface approval must be stated in the project scope.
Timing and acceptance conditions
Maximum speeds, minimum or unloaded times and dry-cycle values, where printed, retain their individual definitions in the table. They are brochure references, not the production cycle of a loaded machine/mold/robot cell. Agree the actual configuration, representative samples, operating conditions and acceptance criteria before relying on a target output. This page does not record a completed trial, FAT or customer acceptance.
Review HT-14PDF Against the Required Motion
Use the HT-14PDA and HT-14PDF motion comparison before treating their shared 1,400 mm arm reference as the deciding factor. This model separately lists transverse D of 2,600 mm and kick E of 1,080 mm; match those movements to the proposed path.
The 0.8–2 s field on this page refers to in-mold unloaded takeout. The 1.8–2.8 s and 2.5–4 s entries retain the brochure’s small-frame and large-frame labeling definitions. The source does not additionally describe those two as unloaded; none of these references establishes a complete cell cycle. Identify the tooling and operation each proposed time covers. Keep molded-sample approval separate from acceptance of the robot motion and integrated timing sequence. Take the defined movements, timing references and open trial conditions into the machine and mold integration review and the engineering proposal review below.
Compare named models and define the project
Compare HT-14PDA and HT-12DPD. Review each named model’s travels, dimensions, load definition and supplied tooling; a shared family or similar value does not establish interchangeability.
Return to IML robot selection for the wider task scope. Send the shortlisted model, drawings, product/label references and unresolved configuration questions for an engineering proposal review.
